- Sutro Biopharma, Inc. (NASDAQ:STRO) has a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) of -105.71% and a Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) of 44.12%, indicating significant inefficiency in generating returns relative to its cost of capital.
- Comparatively, Scholar Rock Holding Corporation has a more negative ROIC but a much lower WACC, suggesting less efficiency in capital utilization than Sutro.
- Y-mAbs Therapeutics, Inc. showcases the highest ROIC to WACC ratio among its peers, indicating better capital management despite operating at a loss.
Sutro Biopharma, Inc. (NASDAQ:STRO) is a biotechnology company focused on developing therapies for cancer and autoimmune diseases. The company uses a proprietary platform to create antibody-drug conjugates and other biologics. In the competitive biotech landscape, Sutro competes with companies like Scholar Rock Holding Corporation, Replimune Group, Y-mAbs Therapeutics, Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, and Kezar Life Sciences.
In evaluating Sutro’s financial efficiency, its Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is -105.71%, while its Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) is 44.12%. This results in a ROIC to WACC ratio of -2.40, indicating a significant inefficiency in generating returns relative to its cost of capital. This is a critical metric for investors assessing the company’s financial health.
Comparatively, Scholar Rock Holding Corporation (SRRK) has an even more negative ROIC of -109.48% against a WACC of 6.07%, leading to a ROIC to WACC ratio of -18.03. This suggests that Scholar Rock is less efficient than Sutro in terms of capital utilization, despite having a lower WACC.
Y-mAbs Therapeutics, Inc. (YMAB) stands out among its peers with a ROIC of -27.64% and a WACC of 6.46%, resulting in the highest ROIC to WACC ratio of -4.28. This indicates that Y-mAbs is managing its capital more efficiently than Sutro and others, despite all companies operating at a loss relative to their cost of capital.
Overall, while Sutro Biopharma’s ROIC to WACC ratio of -2.40 is concerning, it is not the least efficient among its peers. However, potential investors should consider the significant gap between its ROIC and WACC when evaluating the company’s financial performance and future profitability.
